The Argument From Douche-Baggery [Ken Ham Is An Idiot]
For anyone who’s read my previous post concerning Ken Ham, you’ll have gotten a pretty good idea of how ignorant he is. Well, he’s either ignorant, or he’s a liar. I’ll let you decide.
In any case, in keeping with the scientific method – providing evidence to support one’s claims, I have more nail-in-the-coffin evidence that Ken Ham is either (a) ignorant, or (b) lying concerning evolution.
On his Answers In Genesis website, he has a “Media” section with audio, video and pictures of creationist propaganda in easy-to-access, easy-to-use, ignorant form. Of course, it’s all nonsense, lies and misrepresentations of actual science and reality. But, one of these especially caught my attention.
The title of this segment is called “Neptune’s wonders… “proof” of creation?” Here is the segment in question, for your listening pleasure.
The first quote from this work of genius is priceless…
You know, even though the incredible planet of Neptune can’t be explained by evolution, at the same time it really is strong evidence for a young universe. You know why? Well, you see, Neptune is a planet that can’t be explained by long ages of time.
Wow, Ken Ham! Your complete lack of understanding of what evolution is… it’s awe inspiring. I’ve never known someone to so brazenly take their own ignorance of a topic and recklessly use it against people who spend their entire lives studying that particular field. Is tithe money running low?
According to Ham, Neptune “can’t be explained by evolution.”
This just kills me. Okay, let’s take a look at what Ham’s statement actually means.
How about, to elucidate on just how ignorant this quote is, we substitute the word evolution for evolution’s definition. Evolution can be defined as change in the frequency of alleles within a gene pool from one generation to the next.
Now, let’s put this quote into context.
You know, even though the incredible planet of Neptune can’t be explained by changes in the frequency of alleles within a gene pool from one generation to the next, at the same time it really is strong evidence for a young universe. You know why? Well, you see, Neptune is a planet that can’t be explained by long ages of time.
Ken Ham, you are an idiot. Neptune can’t be explained by changes in alleles within a gene pool?
I suppose next you’re going to say that calculus doesn’t explain elephants, and that this is “proof of creation.”
- First of all, as far as we know, Neptune does not have volcanoes.
- Secondly, Neptune does not actually generate heat. It’s surface temperature is -218° Celsius. Pretty cold, if you ask me. (Neptune’s core is around 7,000° Celsius, which is similar to most planets in our solar system.)
- Thirdly, it is actually Neptune’s moon, Triton that has the volcanoes on it. And volcanoes on Triton are perfectly explainable by the gravitational effects of Neptune on Triton’s core. And these are not ordinary volcanoes. They aren’t spewing lava, or molten rock. It’s actually liquid nitrogen, dust and methane compounds.
Hey, Ken Ham. Maybe you should try doing some research on your topics before going off on some kind of nonsense tangent. I get tired of having to interrupt your nonsense with real, verifiable facts.
Now, Neptune may not be explainable by changes in alleles within a gene pool, but it sure can be explained by astronomy, geology and physics.
Ken, how about you try explaining things with regard to the field that they are actually involved with?
The Logical Fallacy
Technically speaking, Ken Ham’s argument, in this case, would be considered a straw man argument. You take a position A (evolution), construct a weaker position B (the “straw man”), and attack that position, instead of position A.
But Ham commits this offense so often, that I have now renamed this fallacy – naming it after Ham. It is now, officially, referred to as the argument from douche-baggery.
Ken Ham is a douche bag.
Read a book.
Search My Blog
You can email me at email@example.com. I'd love to hear what you have to say about my blog. I mean, you can email me along with leaving comments. I'd actually appreciate that even more.
Also, if you find any books on this site interesting, buy them by clicking on the links found here. It will help me out a little, financially.
Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.
|How To Fix Error 445… on “Burn Process Failed…|
|Nate on David Berlinski, Stick To What…|
|theskepticalatheist on An Atheist (Me) Reviews The…|
|danish raza on An Atheist (Me) Reviews The…|
|irishman3876 on MSN’s Hotmail Sucks!|
- There Are No Such Things As Ghosts
- iTunes Library Naming Standards
- iTunes Doesn't Sort By Track Number [Fixed]
- How To Email Executable (EXE) Files
- XBox 360 Error 51-C00DF236 Fixed [Play Videos Offline]
- Snoop: What Your Stuff Says About You [A Review]
- I Fixed My iTunes "Choppy Audio" Problem
- So Your iPod Won't Eject?
- An Atheist (Me) Reviews The Qur'an
- "Burn Process Failed" [Error 4450]
Pick A Topic... Any Topic
- 582,263 Visitors